不同砌筑方式普通砌体结构受压本构模型及抗震性能的研究
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

罗龙(2000—),男,硕士研究生,从事砌体结构的研究。

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

TU36;TU352.3

基金项目:


Study on compressive constitutive models and seismic performance of ordinary brick masonry structures with different masonry methods
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了研究砌筑方式对普通砌体墙力学性能的影响,基于已有试验数据,采用5次多项式数学模型,借鉴混凝土本构模型关系确定方法,引入砌体方式影响系数,全面描述3种不同砌筑方式本构关系曲线的全过程。通过有限元软件ABAQUS对普通砌体墙试件进行分离式建模,将数值模拟结果与试验数据对比分析应力-应变曲线、极限承载力及压应变值;进而得到分离砌体方式影响系数的砌体结构受压本构模型。验证其准确性,能满足工程设计要求并提升计算精度。在此基础上,建立6种本构模型及三维3个不同砌体方式的墙体有限元模型,施加水平往复荷载及竖向荷载,从而研究不同砌筑方式墙体、延性和滞回性能的受力规律。结果表明:丁顺法相较于一顺一丁砌法和三顺一丁砌法的峰值强度分别提高17.51%和26.88%,且其延性性能相对较优。本文成果可为推动砌体结构从凭经验建造向按控能设计、全面提升我国城乡建筑的抗震能力,提供重要的基础理论支撑。

    Abstract:

    To study the influence of masonry methods on the mechanical properties of ordinary brick masonry walls, based on existing experimental data, a quintic polynomial mathematical model is used, the method is determined with reference to the concrete constitutive model relationship, and a masonry method influence coefficient is introduced to comprehensively describe the entire process of constitutive relationship curves for three different masonry methods. Separate modeling of ordinary brick masonry specimens is conducted by means of the finite element software ABAQUS and the numerical simulation results and the experimental data are compared to analyze the stress-strain curves, ultimate bearing capacity, and compressive strain; and a compressive constitutive model for masonry structures incorporating the masonry method influence coefficient is subsequently derived. After the accuracy of the constitutive model was verified, it can meet the engineering calculation requirements and improve the precision of calculation. Furthermore, based on this constitutive model, finite element models of masonry walls with six different masonry methods were built, and horizontal low-cycle reversed loading is applied to systematically study the variation patterns of wall ultimate strength, displacement, ductility, and stiffness. The results indicate that the staggered Flemish bond method exhibits peak loads 17.51% and 26.88% higher than those of the stretcher and header bond method and Sussex garden wall bond method, respectively, with its ductility performance being relatively limited. The findings of this study can provide foundational safety basis for advancing masonry construction from experience-based to performance-based design and comprehensively enhancing the seismic resilience of buildings in urban and rural localities in China.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

罗 龙,高智能,胡 莉.不同砌筑方式普通砌体结构受压本构模型及抗震性能的研究[J].工程建设,2026,58(2):39-46

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-07-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码